i will go for it with RHEL 4 update 4.
It's a 2 node cluster, and my idea was that the risk is in situation when for some reason
the /gfs gets locked .. nested could get unaccessible as well.
Jan
On 1/12/07, Robert Peterson <rpeterso@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Jan Kudjak wrote:
> hi,
> imagine that customer wants to mount another gfs filesystem
> under already mounted gfs filesystem
>
> eg.
>
> /dev/vg01/lvgfs /gfs (filesystem gfs)
> /dev/vg01/lvgfs1 /gfs/shared/gfs1 (filesystem gfs)
> /dev/vg01/lvgfs2 /gfs/shared/gfs2 (filesystem gfs)
>
> do you thing this setup is correct or could it cause some problems ?
>
> thanks
> jan
Hi Jan,
AFAIK, what you've described is supposed to work just fine.
However, this and similar scenarios don't get a lot of testing.
A few weeks back, I uncovered some bugs in a beta version of RHEL5
doing just that, which we consequently fixed. So I'd say: Go ahead
and do it, and if you run into problems, open up a bugzilla.
Regards,
Bob Peterson
Red Hat Cluster Suite
--
Linux-cluster mailing list
Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
-- Linux-cluster mailing list Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
