Thanks,
Tom
On 11/7/06, Dylan Vanderhoof <
DylanV@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Certainly.
dylanv@iscsi0 /var/www/netresponse/lib/NetResponse/Controller $ gfs_tool
version
gfs_tool 1.03.00 (built Oct 17 2006 15:10:45)
Copyright (C) Red Hat, Inc. 2004-2005 All rights reserved.
dylanv@iscsi0 /var/www/netresponse/lib/NetResponse/Controller $ uname -a
Linux iscsi0 2.6.17-gentoo-r8 #8 SMP Fri Sep 15 13:57:05 PDT 2006 i686
Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 3.00GHz GNU/Linux
As long as its not too disruptive, I can definitely run oprofile.
Instructions would be handy however. =)
-Dylan
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wendy Cheng [mailto:wcheng@xxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2006 11:00 AM
> To: linux clustering
> Subject: Re: Ls and globbing taking
> ridiculously long on GFS
>
>
> Dylan Vanderhoof wrote:
> > I understand that a df, or ls -l that requires statting
> files should be
> > slow. However, I'm seeing ridiculous performance of just an ls, or
> > anything doing file globbing in directory reads.
> >
> My guess is that you have lots of small writes before the "ls" that
> generates the disk flushing. Could you pass your kernel and
> gfs versions
> ? Mind running oprofile on your node (I can pass the
> instructions if you
> like) so I can take a look ?
>
> -- Wendy
>
> --
> Linux-cluster mailing list
> Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
>
--
Linux-cluster mailing list
Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
-- Linux-cluster mailing list Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
