Alain Moulle wrote: > Michael Will wrote: > >>> If you stick to the numerical cluster I'd and just use a more robust >>> hash alg you should be fine... >>> > >> We can't change the hash algorithm as it would break backwards compatibility - >> new nodes would hash the same name to a different >> value and refuse to join the cluster. > >> A better solution might be to allow the cluster number to be specified in ccs >> as well as the name so it would override the hash value. >> -- patrick > > Yes, this seems also to me a good solution: if a new field "cluster_id" is set > in cluster.conf (together with "cluster_name") generate_cluster_id takes it, and > if not, it generates the id as usual. > Is there any possibility for such an evolution in a future patch on CS4 U4 ? It's certainly possible. and not to difficult to add I think. Can you raise a bugzilla for it please ? (things in bugzilla are more likely to happen!) -- patrick -- Linux-cluster mailing list Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
