Re: GFS + CORAID Performance Problem

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Not that I know of.  I usually go out of my way to name them explicitly (i.e. GNBD, AoE, NBD).

On Dec 12, 2006, at 8:56 AM, Wendy Cheng wrote:

Jayson Vantuyl wrote:

Yes, this is another big area that needs to get looked into. Network block device is so new (at least on Linux) that it requires some fine-tuning. If folks have working experiences and willing to share, we would be very happy to learn from them.

Just to be clear, the Coraid uses ATA-over-Ethernet.  AoE is a block device that utilizes the network, but it is distinct from the Network Block Device (NBD).

This is clear - somehow I always use "network block device" to describe the device that provides block device service via network (e.g. GFS's GNBD)? Is there a general (and agreed-on) term to describe this type of devices in Linux ?

-- Wendy

--
Linux-cluster mailing list

-- 
Jayson Vantuyl
Systems Architect
Engine Yard


--
Linux-cluster mailing list
Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster

[Index of Archives]     [Corosync Cluster Engine]     [GFS]     [Linux Virtualization]     [Centos Virtualization]     [Centos]     [Linux RAID]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Camping]

  Powered by Linux