Michael Will wrote: > If you stick to the numerical cluster I'd and just use a more robust > hash alg you should be fine... > We can't change the hash algorithm as it would break backwards compatibility - new nodes would hash the same name to a different value and refuse to join the cluster. A better solution might be to allow the cluster number to be specified in ccs as well as the name so it would override the hash value. -- patrick -- Linux-cluster mailing list Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
