On Tue, 2006-12-05 at 16:14 +0100, aleava@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> My doubt is that the sources I download from CVS are not "stable";
> where can I find a stable release?
The STABLE or RHEL4 branches are considered stable.. If you found a
bug, it is also probably in the Red Hat supported products - so it will
need to be fixed.
> <clusternodes>
> <clusternode name="recorder" votes="1">
> <fence/>
... should be:
<fence>
<method name="1">
<device name="Manual_Fencing" nodename="recorder"/>
</method>
</fence>
> </clusternode>
> <clusternode name="data_server" votes="1">
> <fence/>
... should be:
<fence>
<method name="1">
<device name="Manual_Fencing" nodename="data_server"/>
</method>
</fence>
> </clusternode>
> </clusternodes>
> <cman expected_votes="1" two_node="1"/>
> <fencedevices>
> <fencedevice agent="fence_manual" name="Manual_Fencing"/>
> </fencedevices>
> <rm>
You don't need a failoverdomain if you have no resources/services
defined. (You don't need one in your case even if you do; having no
failover domain == same as unordered failoverdomain of all nodes in the
cluster; which is exactly what you defined below :) ).
> <failoverdomains>
> <failoverdomain name="Failover_Domain" ordered="0" restricted="1">
> <failoverdomainnode name="recorder" priority="1"/>
> <failoverdomainnode name="data_server" priority="1"/>
> </failoverdomain>
> </failoverdomains>
> <resources/>
> </rm>
> </cluster>
-- Lon
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- Linux-cluster mailing list Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
