We have just discovered that the bonding is configured differently on each node (p1 is configured for load balancing, p2 is configured for active-backup). We're curious if this bonding configuration could be interfering with the service relocation... could it be a reason why the connection times out... something akin to: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=149867 (bonding contributing to a system hang after a period of time) Does this sound familiar to anyone? Has anyone encoutered anything like this in their experience? Many thanks! Karl On Wed, Nov 15, 2006 at 12:10:19PM +0000, Karl Podesta wrote: > Hi folks, > > When we try to relocate a service between a basic 2-node RHCS 3 setup, we > get the following error message: > > "Member p2 trying to relocate oracle to p1. msg-open: connection timed out. > Could not connect to service manager." > > This also happens if a node in the cluster fails: the service does not > relocate to the other node. There is only the one service on the cluster > (oracle). The cluster is 2 x Dell 2850 with shared SAN storage, > RHAS Update 5, kernel 2.4.21-32.EL SMP for x_64. > > What are the reasons that could cause this failure in relocation to happen? > > Many thanks for any thoughts or suggestions you have! > > Regards, > Karl > > -- > Karl Podesta > Systems Engineer, Securelinx Ltd. > http://www.securelinx.com/ > > -- > Linux-cluster mailing list > Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster > -- Hello. I'm Leonard Nimoy. The following tale of alien encounters is true. And by true, I mean false. It's all lies. But they're entertaining lies. And in the end, isn't that the real truth? The answer is: No. -- What was the question again?, "The Springfield Files" -- Linux-cluster mailing list Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
