Re: LVS, not so fun today...

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11/9/06, isplist@xxxxxxxxxxxx <isplist@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I might have some left over test things here and there, trying to clean it up
as I go. I was trying keepalived but went back to LVS.

Mike


> and just wanted to make sure you are not setting up eth0:1 manually.
> It will be added automatically by lvs. From the looks of that output
> compared to what you have in your lvs config it looks like that is the
> case.



Try removing that interface then starting up pulse. The netmask and
gateway looks really off compared to eth0. Pulse will add the
interface and then write back with your ifconfig output.

--
Linux-cluster mailing list
Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster

[Index of Archives]     [Corosync Cluster Engine]     [GFS]     [Linux Virtualization]     [Centos Virtualization]     [Centos]     [Linux RAID]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Camping]

  Powered by Linux