On Tue, 2006-11-07 at 11:31 -0500, David Brieck Jr. wrote: > After doing much more research I came across the DS300 by IBM. It uses > SCSI drives, is fully redundant, does iSCSI and doesn't cost an arm > and a leg (just an arm). My question is, their site says linux > clustering isn't supported, but does it have to be? Doesn't iSCSI let > you do the same thing GNBD does? > > Also, I talked to someone on their chat who said I could use any U320 > drive with it, basically I could reuse the drives I already have and > just not use my old enclosure. Does that sound right? Any reason I > couldn't do that other than loosing all my data? > > Anyone using a DS300? Seems like with 15k drives it would be pretty darn fast. I haven't tried it, but I'm puzzled as to why IBM would say it didn't work with "Linux clustering". -- Lon -- Linux-cluster mailing list Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
