Yes I was, but if the power controller is down (unreachable)
and the system (node) is hung how can these fence anything?
By pulling the plug you loose both and you can not be sure of anything
since you can not successfully issue a power cycle command.
Thanks for your input though.
and the system (node) is hung how can these fence anything?
By pulling the plug you loose both and you can not be sure of anything
since you can not successfully issue a power cycle command.
Thanks for your input though.
----- Original Message ----
From: Ken Johnson <busyadmin@xxxxxxxxx>
To: linux clustering <linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, September 10, 2006 9:02:19 PM
Subject: Re: power controller is interal/loss of pwer prevents failover: any ideas
From: Ken Johnson <busyadmin@xxxxxxxxx>
To: linux clustering <linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, September 10, 2006 9:02:19 PM
Subject: Re: power controller is interal/loss of pwer prevents failover: any ideas
On Sun, 10 Sep 2006 at 19:02 -0700, Rick Rodgers wrote:
> How does this help? The power controller is still down
Sorry, I obviously don't understand your question. I thought you were
looking for fencing solutions for these devices (1850's).
- Ken
--
Linux-cluster mailing list
Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
> How does this help? The power controller is still down
Sorry, I obviously don't understand your question. I thought you were
looking for fencing solutions for these devices (1850's).
- Ken
--
Linux-cluster mailing list
Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
-- Linux-cluster mailing list Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
