How does this help? The power controller is still down
----- Original Message ----
From: Ken Johnson <busyadmin@xxxxxxxxx>
To: linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Friday, September 8, 2006 4:18:18 PM
Subject: Re: power controller is interal/loss of pwer prevents failover: any ideas
From: Ken Johnson <busyadmin@xxxxxxxxx>
To: linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Friday, September 8, 2006 4:18:18 PM
Subject: Re: power controller is interal/loss of pwer prevents failover: any ideas
On Fri, 8 Sep 2006 11:16:36 -0700, Rick Rodgers wrote:
> Does anyone know of a good solution to providing good failover
> for somthing like a Dell 1850? The issue here is that the power
> souce plug in the back provides power for both the internal power
> controller and the node itself. So if you pull the cord it will not
> failover because it can not Stonith the failed node (power controller is
> down also).
I've used the fence_ipmi and fence_drac agents for these systems successfully.
- Ken
--
Linux-cluster mailing list
Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
> Does anyone know of a good solution to providing good failover
> for somthing like a Dell 1850? The issue here is that the power
> souce plug in the back provides power for both the internal power
> controller and the node itself. So if you pull the cord it will not
> failover because it can not Stonith the failed node (power controller is
> down also).
I've used the fence_ipmi and fence_drac agents for these systems successfully.
- Ken
--
Linux-cluster mailing list
Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
-- Linux-cluster mailing list Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
