RE: Low cost storage for clusters

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Title: RE: Low cost storage for clusters

Classification: UNCLASSIFIED

unfortunately I can't respond privately as it's going off topic, but some of the differentiating factors are chipset choice, per port buffer size, separate buffers for for in/out, speed of switching engine/fabric, and pipelining. I can't presume to say what switch does what. I let guys like NetworkWorld try to figure that out.

> Well said. But I'm still suspicious. You can get a no-name 24-port
> web-managed gigabit ethernet switch from Dell for UKP236 at

Dell stuff is generally just "ok" in my book. Unless you can finger who and what product their OEM'ing I tend to prefer something from a recognized network company. That said, I haven't been bit too hard by Compaq stuff.

--
Linux-cluster mailing list
Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster

[Index of Archives]     [Corosync Cluster Engine]     [GFS]     [Linux Virtualization]     [Centos Virtualization]     [Centos]     [Linux RAID]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Camping]

  Powered by Linux