RE: patch 2.6 kernel without modules

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Title: RE: patch 2.6 kernel without modules

Classification: UNCLASSIFIED


> small as possible (the smallest Fedora/RedHat I could get by
> stripping RPMs was still 650MB).

wow, really? my more or less stripped RH4 is 163 RPMs and a footprint of ~350mb and that is with man pages and all the other junk in /usr/share.

> I would like to work without kernel modules

I'm with you there. however, I would suggest building a minimalist kernel with module support and putting all the standard things compiled in and using modules for extraneous stuff like GFS and cluster services. The reason is GFS etc are a moving target and it's a LOT easier to track the steady stream of bugfixes by just deploying new modules than it is to keep recompiling a full kernel.

unless your webfarm is doing something unusual, NFS will be vastly simpler, easier, and probably a lot faster. I think recent Linux NFS is a much less sucky than it used to be.

--

Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster

[Index of Archives]     [Corosync Cluster Engine]     [GFS]     [Linux Virtualization]     [Centos Virtualization]     [Centos]     [Linux RAID]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Camping]

  Powered by Linux