On Mon, 2006-08-07 at 16:09 -0300, Leonardo Rodrigues de Mello wrote: > Hi everyone, > > Lon you are right for the stable version of DRBD the version 0.7. But DRBD actualy has support for active-active setup in the development version 0.8. There is significant changes between this versions, the entire roadmap can be read at: > http://svn.drbd.org/drbd/trunk/ROADMAP Awesome. :) > > I have done some investigations and tests with DRBD 0.8 in active-active setup with two nodes and OCFS2 and with GFS. This was for one project i was doing related to oracle Rac 10g. > > I have produced one documentation in portuguese that shows how to setup and use drbd in active-active with ocfs2. the link is: > http://guialivre.governoeletronico.gov.br/seminario/index.php/DocumentacaoTecnologiasDRBDOCFS2 > > I have discovered in my investigations that ocfs2 is more unstable that GFS. I have a several kernel panics with ocfs2 under high loads on the machine, but no one with GFS. > > I have the instalation of GFS documented at, one performance test i have done some time ago: > http://guialivre.governoeletronico.gov.br/mediawiki/index.php/TestesGFS > (here i use clvm, and gnbd) > > > The problem of drbd is that actualy you can use just two machines, if you want to use more you need to use the commercial version drbd+. Wow, great information. Thanks! -- Lon -- Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
