2-node fencing question

[danwest@xxxxxxxxxxx]

I was wondering if someone could shed some light on the following scenario:
 
We have a simple 2 node cluster defined with <cman expected_votes="1" two_node="1"/>.  The fencing method is via        
 
              <clusternode name="node1" votes="1">
                        <fence>
                                <method name="single">
                                        <device name="ipmilan" ipaddr="10.1.1.10"/>
                                </method>
                        </fence>
                </clusternode>
                <clusternode name="node2" votes="1">
                        <fence>
                                <method name="single">
                                        <device name="ipmilan" ipaddr="10.1.1.20"/>
                                </method>
                        </fence>
                </clusternode>
 
                <fencedevice name="ipmilan" agent="fence_ipmilan" login="XXXX" passwd=?XXXX"/>
 
The out-of-band IPMI is basically a crossover cable to each other?s IPMI interface.
 
A simple test of pulling the public interface one the node with an active resource results in each node being fenced.  My understanding is that in the 2-node configuration the fencing is a race to see who can fence each other first.  My concerns are the following:
 
1)       If it is indeed a race it seems like both nodes successfully issue a /sbin/fence_ipmilan (ipmi_tool) resulting in both nodes being fenced.
2)       Is there a way for this algorithm to determine which of the nodes was the one that had the problem?  A simple race to fence could result in the faulty server winning.
 
Also is there a way to configure fence_ipmilan in cluster.xml to reboot rather than stop the server?  fence_ipmilan by itself takes the ?o option (on,off,reboot)
 
Thanks,
 Dan

--

Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster