Re: configuration for two hosts directly connected

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On Sat, 15 Jul 2006, Jie Gao wrote:

> Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2006 18:02:17 +1000 (EST)
> From: Jie Gao <J.Gao@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Reply-To: linux clustering <linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx>
> To: linux clustering <linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject:  configuration for two hosts directly connected
>
> Hi All
>
> Since logging for GFS seems to be a potential performance bottleneck, I

Sorry I meant locking.

> wonder, in a two-node cluster, if the two nodes are physically directly
> connected and traffic between the two nodes are directed to use that
> dedicated connection, using an additional interface on each node,
> things would improve.
>
> Supposing it will, how do we configure the interfaces on these
> machines? Is there any existing documentation for this?
>
> I suppose we would use something like this:
>
> node A: 11.22.33.44
> node B: 22.33.44.55
>
> on node A:
>
> route add -host 22.33.44.55 eth1
>
> on node B:
>
> route add -host 11.22.33.44 eth1
>
> Any comment?
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
> Jie
>
> --
> 
> Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
>

--

Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster

[Index of Archives]     [Corosync Cluster Engine]     [GFS]     [Linux Virtualization]     [Centos Virtualization]     [Centos]     [Linux RAID]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Camping]

  Powered by Linux