On Fri, 7 Jul 2006, Kovacs, Corey J. wrote: > Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 07:29:31 -0400 > From: "Kovacs, Corey J." <cjk@xxxxxxxxxx> > Reply-To: linux clustering <linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx> > To: linux clustering <linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: RE: will upgrade of kernel with up2date mess up > myinstall from source? > > First I've heard of this, can you elaborate? What do you mean > it's "broken as far as clustering is concerned" ? Is it just > that the stock GFS/CS RPM's are out of sync or is there something > bad happening? The cluster rpms are installed under kernel-specific trees. The new kernel does not look into those locations to find the clustering modules. Just noticed there is another kernel update available a moment ago... Regards, Jie > > Corey > > -----Original Message----- > From: linux-cluster-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:linux-cluster-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jie Gao > Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2006 9:01 PM > To: linux clustering > Subject: Re: will upgrade of kernel with up2date mess up > myinstall from source? > > > > > On Thu, 6 Jul 2006, Jason wrote: > > > Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 20:55:17 -0400 > > From: Jason <jason@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Reply-To: linux clustering <linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx> > > To: Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx > > Subject: will upgrade of kernel with up2date mess up my > > install from source? > > > > so I notice that up2date wants to update the kernel and friends to > > 2.6.9-34.0.1 > > > > If I do that, will I have to recompile all my rpms? like GFS, > > cman-kernel, dlm-kernel, etc?? Im guessing yes, but just want to make sure. > > Yes. 2.6.9-34.0.1 is broken as far as clustering is concerned. > > There is a workaround, but you wouldn't want to do it that way. > > Regards, > > > > Jie > > > -- > > Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster > > -- > > Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster > -- Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
