Hi, In a performance test with Oracle (using files with direct I/O) it looks like GFS is a factor 2 (!) slower than ext3. Can this be true or should we be able to improve this by tuning etc.? Tests are now done on a single node (of course the purpose is to eventually use it in a real cluster using RHCS) and at this moment we use GFS with lock_nolock. Both GFS and ext3 are used with iSCSI devices (on the same SAN) and everything is done with RHEL4 and the latest updates. Thanks for any suggestions, -- -- Jos Vos <jos@xxxxxx> -- X/OS Experts in Open Systems BV | Phone: +31 20 6938364 -- Amsterdam, The Netherlands | Fax: +31 20 6948204 -- Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
