Re: [NFS] [RFC] NLM lock failover admin interface

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2006-06-14 at 12:36 +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 14, 2006 at 02:54:51AM -0400, Wendy Cheng wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > KABI (kernel application binary interface) commitment is a big thing
> > from our end - so I would like to focus more on the interface agreement
> > before jumping into coding and implementation details. 
> 
> Please stop this crap now.  If zou don't get that there is no kernel internal
> ABI and there never will be get a different job ASAP.

Actually I don't quite understand this statement (sorry! English is not
my native language) but it is ok. People are entitled for different
opinions and I respect yours.  

On the technical side, just a pre-cautious, in case we need to touch
some kernel export symbols so it would be nice to have external (and
admin) interfaces decided before we start to code. 

So I'll not talk about this and I assume we can keep focusing on NLM
issues. No more noises from each other. Fair ?

-- Wendy

--

Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster

[Index of Archives]     [Corosync Cluster Engine]     [GFS]     [Linux Virtualization]     [Centos Virtualization]     [Centos]     [Linux RAID]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Camping]

  Powered by Linux