On Tuesday June 13, wcheng@xxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > One is to register a callback when an interface is shut down. > > Another (possibly the best) is to arrange a new signal for lockd > > which say "Drop any locks which were sent to IP addresses that are > > no longer valid local addresses". > > These, again, give individual filesystem no freedom to adjust what they > need upon failover. But I'll check them out this week - maybe there are > good socket layer hooks that I overlook. > Can you say more about what sort of adjustments an individual filesystem might want the freedom to make? It might help me understand the issues better. Thanks, NeilBrown -- Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
