Re: Shared Filesystem

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 5 Jun 2006, at 19:31, Bill Scherer wrote:

Hey there,

Why? You said it's read only. NFS can handle this, and it's a lot easier to set up and maintain.

Mainly scalability and performance. I've done NFS based systems before and they've had problems once you pass a certain number of clients unless you spend a fortune on NetApps or the equivalent.

Looks like I'm going to go with Storagetek or netapps though. I'd rather have used something like the Equallogic iscsi box, though.

 -- joe.

Joe Warren-Meeks                       T: +44 (0) 208 962 0007
Aggregator Limited                     M: +44 (0) 7789 176078
Unit 62/63 Pall Mall Deposit           E: joe.warren-meeks@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
124-128 Barlby Road, London W10 6BL
PGP Fingerprint: 361F 78D0 56F5 8D7F 2639  947D 71E2 8811 F825 64CC


--

Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster

[Index of Archives]     [Corosync Cluster Engine]     [GFS]     [Linux Virtualization]     [Centos Virtualization]     [Centos]     [Linux RAID]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Camping]

  Powered by Linux