Re: gfs withdrawed in function blkalloc_internal

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, May 13, 2006 at 12:10:50PM +0800, ?????? wrote:

> The clock of 3 nodes are not in synchronization.
> What should be the problem? 

I can't explain the assertion, it wouldn't be caused by the clocks.
Unsynchronized clocks can slow down gfs significantly, though, by causing
constant inode atime updating/locking.

Dave

--

Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster

[Index of Archives]     [Corosync Cluster Engine]     [GFS]     [Linux Virtualization]     [Centos Virtualization]     [Centos]     [Linux RAID]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Camping]

  Powered by Linux