RE: GFS 6.0 - ccsd configuration file

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I've used it (in testing) and I think the main reasons it's "less
recommended"
is that it's easier to keep a single copy consistant on shared storage as
it's
automatic. However the method you mention must be kept consistant manually. I
don't think there is any greater risk for data loss other than that. Others 
may know more tho...


Corey 

-----Original Message-----
From: linux-cluster-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:linux-cluster-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Mathieu Avila
Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2006 2:45 AM
To: linux clustering
Subject:  GFS 6.0 - ccsd configuration file

Hello,

In GFS 6.0, has anybody experienced using a CCA archive on a local file
instead of a shared volume or server ?
More precisely, if using this method correctly by managing the consistency of
the configuration file over all nodes, is there any greater risk of data
corruption than with a shared volume archive or a server ? I am in the
special case where i don't want to manage another shared volume, and this
option, although less documented, seems better to me. Documentation only
tells that it is "less recommanded".

Thanks in advance,

--
Mathieu

--

Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster

--

Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster

[Index of Archives]     [Corosync Cluster Engine]     [GFS]     [Linux Virtualization]     [Centos Virtualization]     [Centos]     [Linux RAID]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Camping]

  Powered by Linux