other cluster FS

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Title: other cluster FS

Classification: UNCLASSIFIED

with the latest community kernel release I was looking at oracle's FS and then SGI's CXFS. I liked the CXFS paper and wondered if GFS was working in similar fashion where meta-data is stored by a 'master' and then pieces of it farmed out to nodes as required. So essentially all meta-data resides on the first one to mount GFS I guess and it handles the periodic flushing of changes? Is there a machanism to designate "backup" masters or does this arise implicitly by virtue of a neighboring node(s)recovering a peer's journals after an election?

CXFS is/was available on seemingly a number of different OS's. Anyone actually using it? Is GFS ported to anything besides Linux? I want and intend to standardize on Linux as the bare-metal OS, but being able to play nice with winblows would be really cool. Does CXFS use DLM and other pieces of the Linux Clustering package set? I was really not impressed by the claim that OCFS2 panics the machine on error. Is that for real?

Anyone try IBM's GPFS?

--

Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster

[Index of Archives]     [Corosync Cluster Engine]     [GFS]     [Linux Virtualization]     [Centos Virtualization]     [Centos]     [Linux RAID]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Camping]

  Powered by Linux