On Wednesday 15 March 2006 14:41, Filipe Miranda wrote: > Just one question about running multiple samba servers using GFS.... > You can have the same dada to be shared on multiple servers, but each samba > server will need a differente NETBIOS name on the network right? Yes. Every server also needs two IPs ond VIP and one IP and every Server needs to be registered in the Windows domain. Just like the "active/active" Microsoft Cluster Services work. > > So if I have a WindowsXP client machine, it will have to map 2(or more) > network paths to reach each samba server. No. Basically every server serves exactly its shares exclusively. HA-services take over the availability. But the active/active granularity is the share. If you would like to have real loadblancing you would need a samba which is capable of that (I also heard samba4 will solve that issue). > > Am I correct? If so, how to address this issue so the user can have just > one network mapped drive accessing multiple samba servers(if necessary, if > one machine fails for example?) That is not possible. Sorry for the missunderstanding Marc. > > Att. > Filipe Miranda > > On 3/15/06, Marc Grimme <grimme@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hello, > > we have some customers that have samba clusters with GFS running for a > > long > > time without problems. There are some things you need to take into > > account but nevertheless samba on GFS runs very well even when you export > > the same data via NFS. > > E.G. one customer runs a "active/active" Samba/NFS Cluster on GFS as ADS > > Member for about a year (up to 600 Users) without problems. > > I would say samba and GFS is a very nice combination. > > Regards Marc. > > > > On Wednesday 15 March 2006 07:30, Robert Ruge wrote: > > > I have had problems with samba running on just one node. It works for > > > a while and then samba just starts locking up. > > > > > > Not a reccomended path if you ask me. > > > > > > Robert > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: linux-cluster-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx > > > > [mailto:linux-cluster-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Birger Wathne > > > > Sent: Wednesday, 15 March 2006 5:17 > > > > To: linux clustering > > > > Subject: Re: samba on gfs > > > > > > > > Erling Nygaard wrote: > > > > > Birger > > > > > > > > > > The short story is that Samba keeps some state information > > > > > > > > internally. > > > > > > > > > So there are issues with keeping multiple Samba serves in sync. > > > > > The information in question is not synced to the underlying > > > > > filesystem, so GFS can't really do the job of keeping this info in > > > > > sync between the nodes. > > > > > > > > > > I am sure other people on the list can provide more details of the > > > > > problem and status of any progress :-) > > > > > > > > So... This means there is a problem only when you want to run > > > > multiple samba > > > > servers in a cluster? There should be no problem sharing the > > > > same GFS disk > > > > for one samba instance and one NFS instance running on > > > > separate nodes (or > > > > even on the same node during maintenance)? > > > > > > > > -- > > > > birger > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx > > > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster > > > > > > -- > > > > > > Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx > > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster > > > > -- > > Gruss / Regards, > > > > Marc Grimme > > Phone: +49-89 121 409-54 > > http://www.atix.de/ http://www.open-sharedroot.org/ > > > > ** > > ATIX - Ges. fuer Informationstechnologie und Consulting mbH > > Einsteinstr. 10 - 85716 Unterschleissheim - Germany > > > > -- > > > > Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster > > -- > Att. > --- > Filipe T Miranda > RHCE - Red Hat Certified Engineer > OCP8i - Oracle Certified Professional -- Gruss / Regards, Marc Grimme Phone: +49-89 121 409-54 http://www.atix.de/ http://www.open-sharedroot.org/ ** ATIX - Ges. fuer Informationstechnologie und Consulting mbH Einsteinstr. 10 - 85716 Unterschleissheim - Germany -- Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
