R: samba on gfs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



 

> -----Messaggio originale-----
> Da: linux-cluster-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:linux-cluster-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] Per conto di Marc Grimme
> Inviato: mercoledì 15 marzo 2006 8.45
> A: linux clustering
> Oggetto: Re:  samba on gfs
> 
> Hello,
> we have some customers that have samba clusters with GFS 
> running for a long time without problems. There are some 
> things you need to take into account but nevertheless samba 
> on GFS runs very well even when you export the same data via NFS. 
> E.G. one customer runs a "active/active" Samba/NFS Cluster on 
> GFS as ADS Member for about a year (up to 600 Users) without problems.
> I would say samba and GFS is a very nice combination.
> Regards Marc.

Maybe it can be interesting if you can post the smb.conf used.

Leandro

> 
> On Wednesday 15 March 2006 07:30, Robert Ruge wrote:
> > I have had problems with samba running on just one node. It 
> works for 
> > a while and then samba just starts locking up.
> >
> > Not a reccomended path if you ask me.
> >
> > Robert
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: linux-cluster-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx 
> > > [mailto:linux-cluster-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of 
> Birger Wathne
> > > Sent: Wednesday, 15 March 2006 5:17
> > > To: linux clustering
> > > Subject: Re:  samba on gfs
> > >
> > > Erling Nygaard wrote:
> > > > Birger
> > > >
> > > > The short story is that Samba keeps some state information
> > >
> > > internally.
> > >
> > > > So there are issues with keeping multiple Samba serves in sync.
> > > > The information in question is not synced to the underlying 
> > > > filesystem, so GFS can't really do the job of keeping 
> this info in 
> > > > sync between the nodes.
> > > >
> > > > I am sure other people on the list can provide more 
> details of the 
> > > > problem and status of any progress :-)
> > >
> > > So... This means there is a problem only when you want to run 
> > > multiple samba servers in a cluster? There should be no problem 
> > > sharing the same GFS disk for one samba instance and one NFS 
> > > instance running on separate nodes (or even on the same 
> node during 
> > > maintenance)?
> > >
> > > --
> > > birger
> > >
> > > --
> > > 
> > > Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
> > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
> >
> > --
> > 
> > Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
> > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
> 
> --
> Gruss / Regards,
> 
> Marc Grimme
> Phone: +49-89 121 409-54
> http://www.atix.de/               http://www.open-sharedroot.org/
> 
> **
> ATIX - Ges. fuer Informationstechnologie und Consulting mbH 
> Einsteinstr. 10 - 85716 Unterschleissheim - Germany
> 
> --
> 
> Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
> 

--

Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster

[Index of Archives]     [Corosync Cluster Engine]     [GFS]     [Linux Virtualization]     [Centos Virtualization]     [Centos]     [Linux RAID]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Camping]

  Powered by Linux