> -----Messaggio originale----- > Da: linux-cluster-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:linux-cluster-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] Per conto di Marc Grimme > Inviato: mercoledì 15 marzo 2006 8.45 > A: linux clustering > Oggetto: Re: samba on gfs > > Hello, > we have some customers that have samba clusters with GFS > running for a long time without problems. There are some > things you need to take into account but nevertheless samba > on GFS runs very well even when you export the same data via NFS. > E.G. one customer runs a "active/active" Samba/NFS Cluster on > GFS as ADS Member for about a year (up to 600 Users) without problems. > I would say samba and GFS is a very nice combination. > Regards Marc. Maybe it can be interesting if you can post the smb.conf used. Leandro > > On Wednesday 15 March 2006 07:30, Robert Ruge wrote: > > I have had problems with samba running on just one node. It > works for > > a while and then samba just starts locking up. > > > > Not a reccomended path if you ask me. > > > > Robert > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: linux-cluster-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx > > > [mailto:linux-cluster-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of > Birger Wathne > > > Sent: Wednesday, 15 March 2006 5:17 > > > To: linux clustering > > > Subject: Re: samba on gfs > > > > > > Erling Nygaard wrote: > > > > Birger > > > > > > > > The short story is that Samba keeps some state information > > > > > > internally. > > > > > > > So there are issues with keeping multiple Samba serves in sync. > > > > The information in question is not synced to the underlying > > > > filesystem, so GFS can't really do the job of keeping > this info in > > > > sync between the nodes. > > > > > > > > I am sure other people on the list can provide more > details of the > > > > problem and status of any progress :-) > > > > > > So... This means there is a problem only when you want to run > > > multiple samba servers in a cluster? There should be no problem > > > sharing the same GFS disk for one samba instance and one NFS > > > instance running on separate nodes (or even on the same > node during > > > maintenance)? > > > > > > -- > > > birger > > > > > > -- > > > > > > Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx > > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster > > > > -- > > > > Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster > > -- > Gruss / Regards, > > Marc Grimme > Phone: +49-89 121 409-54 > http://www.atix.de/ http://www.open-sharedroot.org/ > > ** > ATIX - Ges. fuer Informationstechnologie und Consulting mbH > Einsteinstr. 10 - 85716 Unterschleissheim - Germany > > -- > > Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster > -- Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
