Lon, Thanks for your reply. In my system I don't use any lock system like lock_gulm or lock_dlm, I use no_lock because our applications' limitation. Do you think no_lock will also bring some lock traffic or not? When I tried lock_gulm before, our application had very bad performance, so I choose no_lock. And I'm not sure which update we have right now. Do you know the versions for clumanager and redhat-config-cluster of RHCS3U7? Hong -----Original Message----- From: linux-cluster-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:linux-cluster-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Lon Hohberger Sent: Wednesday, March 08, 2006 4:52 PM To: linux clustering Subject: RE: Cluster service restarting Locally On Mon, 2006-03-06 at 14:02 -0600, Hong Zheng wrote: > I'm having the same problem. My system configuration is as follows: > > 2-node cluster: RH ES3, GFS6.0, clumanager-1.2.28-1 and > redhat-config-cluster-1.0.8-1 > > Kernel: 2.4.21-37.EL > > Linux-iscsi-3.6.3 initiator: connections to iSCSI shared storage > server If it's not fixed in U7 (which I think it should be), please file a bugzilla... It sounds like the lock traffic is getting network-starved. -- Lon -- Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster -- Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
