RE: RHEL4.0 CS and Ldap

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Thanks Corey.

That's exactly what I want.

At least 2 servers doing replication and the failover part is just moving the virtual IP to the slave server..


Thanks..
 

-----Original Message-----
From: linux-cluster-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:linux-cluster-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Kovacs, Corey J.
Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2006 8:25 AM
To: linux clustering
Subject: RE:  RHEL4.0 CS and Ldap

Dalton, I figured as much and you could indeed use the CS portion to do what Heartbeat does. I do that same thing on RHEL3CS. It's the replication part that doesn't fall into the clusterring category, that's all. The cluster serverices (resource
manager) does, in
effect, what hearbeat does tho so you can either have a single instence bounce aroung from node to node as needed, or you could have a master + replicas all running at the same time (with differnet data stores) and not have to worry about the service failing over, just flip IP address, which is what it sounds like you are doing already. For better performance tho, if that's needed, you'll prolly want the LVS (piranha) solution.



Good luck



Corey 

-----Original Message-----
From: linux-cluster-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:linux-cluster-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Dalton, Maurice
Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2006 9:17 AM
To: linux clustering
Subject: RE:  RHEL4.0 CS and Ldap

I am currently using Heartbeat to solve my need for Highly Available Ldap
servers. I was just trying to figure another way to provide HA, replication
with RHEL4.0 CS.  It would be nice to build a RHEL4.0 CS service for ldap
that would cover all of my requirements.

Just a thought.
Thanks for the replies...
 

-----Original Message-----
From: linux-cluster-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:linux-cluster-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Kovacs, Corey J.
Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2006 8:08 AM
To: linux clustering
Subject: RE:  RHEL4.0 CS and Ldap

You might be able to, but it's not really cluster related. You'll get better
information on the openldap lists.


Cheers.



Corey 

-----Original Message-----
From: linux-cluster-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:linux-cluster-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Baesso Mirko
Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2006 9:00 AM
To: linux clustering
Subject: R:  RHEL4.0 CS and Ldap

Sorry but i try to use sync-replica either then slurpd on openldap 2.3, can i
setup a multi-master environment?


Baesso Mirko - System Engineer
KSolutions.S.p.A.
Via Lenin 132/26
56017  S.Martino Ulmiano (PI) - Italy
tel.+ 39 0 50 898369 fax. + 39 0 50 861200
baesso@xxxxxxxxxxxxx   http//www.ksolutions.it

-----Messaggio originale-----
Da: Kovacs, Corey J. [mailto:cjk@xxxxxxxxxx]
Inviato: giovedì 9 marzo 2006 14.43
A: linux clustering
Oggetto: RE:  RHEL4.0 CS and Ldap

Multi master LDAP is not all that it's cracked up to be. There are few
benefits in being able to write to different servers. The problem is that
like many things, the rule is "Last write wins". Writing in LDAP dirs is not
something that is "typically" done in high volumes anyway, but reading is. If
you just need to load balance traffic, then you might look into an LVS
implementation. That way you can set up several replicas and spread the load
across them. If your Master gets blown away, you can promote of the replicas
to a master.. Just takes some manual intervention.


Just my two cents...


Corey 

-----Original Message-----
From: linux-cluster-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:linux-cluster-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Nick Burrett
Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2006 4:49 AM
To: linux clustering
Subject: Re:  RHEL4.0 CS and Ldap

Rainer Duffner wrote:
> Lon Hohberger wrote:
> 
>> On Wed, 2006-03-08 at 12:43 -0600, Dalton, Maurice wrote:
>>  
>>
>>> Is there a way to create an Ldap cluster that can do replication 
>>> with RHEL 4.0 CS?
>>>   
>>
>>
>> For some reason, I though OpenLDAP had built-in replication?
>>  
>>
> 
> 
> Not multi-master (which I assume is what the original poster wants).
> 
> http://www.redhat.com/en_us/USA/home/solutions/directoryserver/
> 
> exists for a reason...

As I understand it, multi-master can be accomplished in OpenLDAP 2.3 using
sync-replication between the two nodes.  This is not true multi-master, but
the effect is near-enough.

Regards,

Nick.

--

Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster

--

Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster




--

Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster

--

Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster

--

Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster

--

Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster

--

Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster

[Index of Archives]     [Corosync Cluster Engine]     [GFS]     [Linux Virtualization]     [Centos Virtualization]     [Centos]     [Linux RAID]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Camping]

  Powered by Linux