Re: Using GFS on a hybrid system

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Hi,

On Thu, 2 Mar 2006, Devrim GUNDUZ wrote:

Due to a binary driver problem (IBM!), we had to install RHEL ES 4 U1 to 4 servers (Let's call them S1, S2, S3 and S4) . The other ones have RHEL AS 4 U2 (S5,S6,S7,S8) . The ESU1 ones have GFS 6.0 and the other ones have 6.1.

Oops, there is a typo: The ESU1 ones have GFS 6.1 and the other ones have 6.1.3.

* Is using GFS 6.0 and 6.1 dangerous? I have to use 6.0 in ESU1 servers. Should I rollback to RHEL AS 4 U1 on the U2 systems?

This should also be " Is using GFS 6.1.0 and 6.1.3 dangerous?"

Regards,
--
Devrim GUNDUZ
Kivi Bilişim Teknolojileri         -          http://www.kivi.com.tr
devrim~gunduz.org, devrim~PostgreSQL.org, devrim.gunduz~linux.org.tr
                      http://www.gunduz.org
--

Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster

[Index of Archives]     [Corosync Cluster Engine]     [GFS]     [Linux Virtualization]     [Centos Virtualization]     [Centos]     [Linux RAID]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Camping]

  Powered by Linux