RE: Performance of ES3+GFS6.0+GNBD+LOCK_GULM

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2006-01-31 at 09:02 -0600, Hong Zheng wrote:
> I found a problem with lock_nolock. If I mount two GFS nodes to the
> same GFS filesystem, actually each node just treats it as local drive,
> whenever I make some change on one node, the change won’t show up on
> the other node. I don’t know if this is why the manual says that
> lock_nolock only works for single node, or is there a workaround to
> resolve this issue?

It says so right here:

http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/csgfs/admin-guide/s1-lock-nolock.html

-- Lon



--

Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster

[Index of Archives]     [Corosync Cluster Engine]     [GFS]     [Linux Virtualization]     [Centos Virtualization]     [Centos]     [Linux RAID]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Camping]

  Powered by Linux