On Fri, 2006-01-27 at 08:09 +0100, Alain Moulle wrote: > What about the case where the failed node has a failure > such as poweron is no more possible ? > In this case, I think the CS4 will not failover and will > be stalled, will it? That's correct, it would stall. Is there a case where this happens frequently in your testing? > Why not considering only the poweroff status ? I would > have thought it was sufficient to takeover without any > risk of double access to shared disk space, am I wrong ? This is sufficient, you are correct. I expect the case where 'on' failing is extremely rare, especially when the 'off' succeeded a few seconds before. Since you have already looked at this in some detail, do you have a patch and/or would you like to file a bugzilla? -- Lon -- Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
