RE: Network hiccup + power-fencing = both nodes godown (redhat cluster 4)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Patrick, this is awesome.  Here are my numbers:

[root@server1 ~]# cat /proc/cluster/config/cman/hello_timer
5
[root@server1 ~]# cat /proc/cluster/config/cman/deadnode_timeout
21
[root@server1 ~]#

I'm assuming these are seconds.  I think if I increase the
deadnode_timeout to maybe 120, then a network hiccup or major glitch
(like a reboot of a switch) could be ignored.

Thanks again!
Jeff

-----Original Message-----
From: linux-cluster-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:linux-cluster-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Patrick Caulfield
Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 7:58 AM
To: linux clustering
Subject: Re:  Network hiccup + power-fencing = both nodes
godown (redhat cluster 4)

Jeff Harr wrote:
> I thought about a crossover cable :)  But I think that, these being
> blade servers, there's no connection in the back for that.  I could be
> wrong though - I just don't have the hardware around to look at right
> this second (its in a datacenter).
> 
> One thing on the heartbeats: the message log says "missed too many
> heartbeats".  Off-hand, do you know where the number of heartbeats is
> configured?

/proc/cluster/config/cman/hello_timer
/proc/cluster/config/cman/deadnode_timeout

-- 

patrick

--

Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster


--

Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster

[Index of Archives]     [Corosync Cluster Engine]     [GFS]     [Linux Virtualization]     [Centos Virtualization]     [Centos]     [Linux RAID]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Camping]

  Powered by Linux