Hello all, I am a beginner in the world of cluster and high availability. I have two mid-range servers (DELL) intended for web hosting. Each has it's own disk storage of some TB each. I don't have any shared storage for both of these servers. Both the servers are loaded with FC-4. Currently one of the server is active(other one is not functional). Now I need to cluster both these machines , so that I can make the servers high available and high performance. But still the priority is for High-Availability. I have tested different cluster suites including redhat clusters. But I'm confused in benchmarking these software. Yesterday I came across Linux Virtual Server. I have read the documents at http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/csgfs/browse/rh-cs-en/pt-lvs.html. Now I'm confused more .. I'll be greatly obliged if someone can help in making a decision between redhat cluster suite and linux virtual server. If somebody have experience in both these kindly provide a comparative study including their pros & cons. Applications that are intended to be deployed are: apache, openldap, mysql, postgresql, asterisk, openvpn. thanks in advance regards Manilal -- Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
