On Tue, 2005-12-13 at 20:12 -0600, vze8dkpl@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > Thanks for the response. The machines I am using for testing HP > DL380 w/2 cpu's and 3GB of ram. Can you explain why GFS stopped > cleaning up after itself even though the high water mark was set to > 10000? The locks remained at 300K+ and never went back down. This is first time we have such report (lock count higher than lt_high_locks) since normally we have users set "lt_high_locks" to higher values than default 1024*1024. Will look into this issue more. Intuitively I suspect there is a time lag between sending and receiving of "lock full" messages between daemons > > I'd be glad to try the new revision, just let me know how to get > it. Also a list of tunables would be good as well. Is it possible for you to log a support call or open a bugzilla (so we can have some records internally) ? Will work with our maintainer tomorrow to put the test RPMs somewhere that you can retrieve. -- Wendy -- Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
