Re: Re: Linux-cluster Digest, Vol 20, Issue 12

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> ==========================
> Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 01:42:11 -0800 (PST)
> From: Alan Wood <chekov@xxxxxxxx>
> To: linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
> Subject:  Re: Linux-cluster Digest, Vol 20, Issue 
> 12
> ==========================


[...]

> SMB is stateful and not cluster 
> aware, 


I'm defintely missing something in my assumptions. By its very nature, shouldn't GFS be prescinding from its application, as in every other filesystem?

Also, pls allow the ingenuous question, what number of applications needs ever to be cluster aware, if not a very strict one? Also, intuitively as it may come, should a properly written applicative be independent of the operating filesystem properties?
Thanks.


--

Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster

[Index of Archives]     [Corosync Cluster Engine]     [GFS]     [Linux Virtualization]     [Centos Virtualization]     [Centos]     [Linux RAID]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Camping]

  Powered by Linux