Re: two fencing problems

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



David Teigland wrote:
On Wed, Dec 07, 2005 at 02:32:37PM -0500, Greg Forte wrote:

there's apparently a bug in fenced where it passes an "option=on" to the fence_apc agent, when it clearly should be "option = off". Or else ccsd is misparsing the cluster.conf file. I don't see how else to explain that the conf file said "off", then "on", but the daemon did "on", "on".


This may be the bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=172401

That certainly appears to be it!  Thanks.

Now I don't suppose there's one for system-config-cluster not being able to read the configuration file it just wrote after adding a fence method to a node ... I'm not finding one, but apparently my luck/skill with bugzilla is pretty poor. ;-)

-g

Greg Forte
gforte@xxxxxxxx
IT - User Services
University of Delaware
302-831-1982
Newark, DE

--

Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster

[Index of Archives]     [Corosync Cluster Engine]     [GFS]     [Linux Virtualization]     [Centos Virtualization]     [Centos]     [Linux RAID]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Camping]

  Powered by Linux