On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 04:55:58PM -0500, Lon Hohberger wrote: > On Tue, 2005-11-08 at 11:38 +0100, Axel Thimm wrote: > > It depends on how many IPs you'd like to reserve. I'd go for at least > > two to have a default config for redundant intracluster > > networking. And cman would by default use only the first one. > > I wonder if we should just ask for a /20 or so range, so that all F/OSS > cluster projects can use the same known range in the future? /me shrugs /20? Do you think one would need 4096 IPs? I thought that cman and similar cluster constructs *should* be restricted to local or organizational scope, and even if one would assign one IP per cluster that sounds like too much. OTOH better more than less. -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Attachment:
pgptEzdGEoCBz.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
