Whoops, forgot to cc linux-cluster.
-- Lon
--- Begin Message ---
On Wed, 2005-11-02 at 16:40 +0600, Hirantha Wijayawardena wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> Thanks a lot for support you guys. I managed to start the cluster with
> fenced. I tried what Dave told me - but I'm not sure whether this is what he
> told coz I don't have a clue
>
> I changed the fence-levels between 2 nodes. Say:
> Node1 --> HPiLO_node2 --> fence-level-1
> Node2 --> HPiLO_node1 --> fence-level-6
The point is that Node1 should have the device(s) controlling *Node1* in
its fence block. Node1's fence block is *not* this:
"What devices can Node1 use to fence off Node2...?"
... it is:
"What devices can other nodes use to fence off Node1...?"
I'm going to go out on a limb and state that I think HPiLO_node2 is the
iLO card residing in Node2, and HPiLO_node1 is the iLO card which is in
Node1. If that is the case, I suspect you need to have your config look
like this:
<clusternodes>
<clusternode name="node1" votes="1">
<fence>
<method name="1"/>
<device name="HPiLO_node1"/>
<!-- ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^-->
</method>
</fence>
</clusternode>
<clusternode name="node2" votes="1">
<fence>
<method name="1">
<device name="HPiLO_node2"/>
<!-- ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^-->
</method>
</fence>
</clusternode>
</clusternodes>
<cman expected_votes="1" two_node="1"/>
<fencedevices>
<fencedevice agent="fence_ilo" hostname="10.10.10.1"
login="Administrator" name="HPiLO_node1"
passwd="RWE232WE"/>
<fencedevice agent="fence_ilo" hostname="10.10.10.2"
login="Administrator" name="HPiLO_node2"
passwd="QWD31D4D"/>
Fence levels are sets of procedures to try for fencing. Most users (you
included) should only ever need 1 fence level. :)
-- Lon
--- End Message ---
--
Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
