If you get any personal replies that don't go back to the list,
I would be very interested in the result.
How far along are those projects like CLVM and others listed
on http://sources.redhat.com/cluster/ ?
Michael
Jeff Hardy wrote:
Hello,
I have noted that LVM2 on a 2.6 kernel (in this case Fedora Core 4), has
no limit to the maximum number of logical volumes, physical volumes, or
physical extents in a particular volume group. Is this also then the
case for CLVM?
Also, I have a couple of boxes sharing ATAoE storage right now in a
two-node cluster configuration. Everything looks good. We are not
using GFS as of yet, and do not have immediate plans to do so, so I have
been working with XFS and other filesystems in a couple of LVs with each
box only mounting one LV at a time (obviously). In the interest of
seeing what could happen, I have purposely shutdown all the cluster
services on both boxes, resized volumes, done write tests and not seen
any filesystem corruption. Have I just been incredibly lucky to avoid
particular race conditions?
Thanks very much.
--
Michael Will
Penguin Computing Corp.
Sales Engineer
415-954-2822
415-954-2899 fx
mwill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
