Re: Samba failover "impossible" due to missing cifs client reconnect?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2005-09-07 at 22:15 +0200, Axel Thimm wrote:
> After having setup our workarounds for NFS we are very happy with how
> it's working. Now we're looking at Samba.
> 
> But we have quite a showstopper right at the beginning. The smb/cifs
> clients, be it smbclient or Windows XP, don't like their TCP stream
> being resetted and don't retry/reconnect (contrary to NFS).
> 
> It looks like the protocol has no considerations for retries above the
> TCP/IP level. So when the TCP stream is torn on the server's side due
> to relocation (either due to crash/fencing or soft) any client
> smb/cifs activity is broken at that time.
> 
> This means that any data transfer via smb/cifs shares during the
> relocation will fail, and there is nothing we can do on the server's
> side. Or is there?

Potentially not, in the past, we've always had clients reconnect.

-- Lon


--

Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster

[Index of Archives]     [Corosync Cluster Engine]     [GFS]     [Linux Virtualization]     [Centos Virtualization]     [Centos]     [Linux RAID]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Camping]

  Powered by Linux