Re: Re: Samba failover "impossible" due to missing cifs client reconnect?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Sep 07, 2005 at 10:51:16PM +0200, Axel Thimm wrote:
: :
> > I just tested this.  On a W/XP box I browsed through some directories on a 
> > share served by Samba.  I then shut Samba down, and tried viewing some 
> > different subdirectories of the same share.  Windows coughed up an error 
> > dialog.  I then restarted Samba and Windows got happy again.  I could 
> > browse through all of the subdirectories in the share.
> 
> Yes, that does work, but what I wanted to setup is a transparent
> failover, so that network I/O recovers w/o any manual interaction.
>
> I.e. I don't want to (soft) relocate the samba shares onto another
> node due to load ballancing considerations and generate user visible
> I/O errors and failures on a dozen clients.

I guess I'm not really clear on what it is you're trying to accomplish.
Can you provide a little more description of what you'd like to see 
happen, and what kinds of environments you expect?

Chris -)-----

-- 
"Implementing CIFS - the Common Internet FileSystem" ISBN: 013047116X
Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/     -)-----   Christopher R. Hertel
jCIFS Team -- http://jcifs.samba.org/   -)-----   ubiqx development, uninq.
ubiqx Team -- http://www.ubiqx.org/     -)-----   crh@xxxxxxxxxxxx
OnLineBook -- http://ubiqx.org/cifs/    -)-----   crh@xxxxxxxxx

--

Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster

[Index of Archives]     [Corosync Cluster Engine]     [GFS]     [Linux Virtualization]     [Centos Virtualization]     [Centos]     [Linux RAID]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Camping]

  Powered by Linux