Re: GFS, what's remaining

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2005-09-03T01:57:31, Daniel Phillips <phillips@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> The only current users of dlms are cluster filesystems.  There are zero users 
> of the userspace dlm api. 

That is incorrect, and you're contradicting yourself here:

> What does have to be resolved is a common API for node management.  It is not 
> just cluster filesystems and their lock managers that have to interface to 
> node management.  Below the filesystem layer, cluster block devices and 
> cluster volume management need to be coordinated by the same system, and 
> above the filesystem layer, applications also need to be hooked into it.  
> This work is, in a word, incomplete.

The Cluster Volume Management of LVM2 for example _does_ use simple
cluster-wide locks, and some OCFS2 scripts, I seem to recall, do too.

(EVMS2 in cluster-mode uses a verrry simple locking scheme which is
basically operated by the failover software and thus uses a different
model.)


Sincerely,
    Lars Marowsky-Brée <lmb@xxxxxxx>

-- 
High Availability & Clustering
SUSE Labs, Research and Development
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH - A Novell Business	 -- Charles Darwin
"Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge"

--

Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster

[Index of Archives]     [Corosync Cluster Engine]     [GFS]     [Linux Virtualization]     [Centos Virtualization]     [Centos]     [Linux RAID]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Camping]

  Powered by Linux