> That's GFS. The submission is about a GFS2 that's on-disk incompatible > to GFS. Just like say reiserfs3 and reiserfs4 or ext and ext2 or ext2 and ext3 then. I think the main point still stands - we have always taken multiple file systems on board and we have benefitted enormously from having the competition between them instead of a dictat from the kernel kremlin that 'foofs is the one true way' Competition will decide if OCFS or GFS is better, or indeed if someone comes along with another contender that is better still. And competition will probably get the answer right. The only thing that is important is we don't end up with each cluster fs wanting different core VFS interfaces added. Alan -- Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
