thanks
Matt
On Mon, 2005-08-29 at 15:17, AJ Lewis wrote:
On Mon, Aug 29, 2005 at 03:06:19PM -0600, Matthew B. Brookover wrote: > Aj, thank you for the quick response. > > The patches changed the situation. Postmark now runs without any > errors, gfs_fsck still has some problems. I do not understand why > postmark did not report any errors because the patches all appeared to > be for fsck. Actually, this is normal output for the fsck. The way GFS works is that any metadata that is deleted is actually converted to unused metadata blocks for later reuse instead of being freed completely. The way the fsck tracks block use, it ends up converting all these blocks back to free blocks. So basically this is what a normal fsck looks like when run on a gfs filesystem that had lots of files deleted. > Output from gfs_fsck: > > [root@illusion root]# gfs_fsck -y /dev/pool/u_as > Initializing fsck
-- Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
