On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 09:33:41AM -0700, Zach Brown wrote: > ordering when multiple file systems are concerned. It doesn't record > the ranges of the mappings involved so Lustre can't properly use its > range locks. That doesn't matter. Please don't put in any effort for lustre special cases - they are unwilling to cooperate and they'll get what they deserve. > And finally, it doesn't prohibit mapping operations for > the duration of the IO -- the whole reason we ended up in this thread in > the first place :) > > Christoph, would you be interested in looking at a more thorough patch > if I threw one together? Sure, I'm not sure that'll happen in a timely fashion, though. -- Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
