Re: [PATCH 00/14] GFS

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2005-08-10T08:03:09, Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > Kindly lose the "Context Dependent Pathname" crap.
> Same for ocfs2.

Would a generic implementation of that higher up in the VFS be more
acceptable?

It's not like context-dependent symlinks are an arbitary feature, but
rather very useful in practice.


Sincerely,
    Lars Marowsky-Brée <lmb@xxxxxxx>

-- 
High Availability & Clustering
SUSE Labs, Research and Development
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH - A Novell Business	 -- Charles Darwin
"Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge"

--

Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster

[Index of Archives]     [Corosync Cluster Engine]     [GFS]     [Linux Virtualization]     [Centos Virtualization]     [Centos]     [Linux RAID]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Camping]

  Powered by Linux