Steven Dake wrote: > Thats great news Patrick. One thing you should be aware of is that I > have changed some of the internal interfaces in preparation for others > to use libtotem to be extremely more sanitary. Unfortunately I may have > done this a little too late in your case.. But I think you will find > things are a little better. It really only effects totempg_initialize. > Also libtotem was renamed to libtotem_pg because of requests from Daniel > about a name-space collision with some movie player in fc4. Yes I spotted that, my current "nearly-working" cman is based on the latest SVN sources. > For multihoming, I want to support the totem redundant ring protocol in > the totem code. This is an extension of totemsrp to support multiple > nics per processor. Then data is either actively or passively > replicated over multiple links. There is essentially no failover and > multiple links can offer better performance and still operate properly > when one entire network fails. It looks pretty simple to implement. > The paper is at: > > http://www.rcsc.de/pdf/icdcs02.pdf Excellent, thanks. I'll have a read. -- patrick -- Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
