Drbd 0.8 will be active-active. Nuno Fernandes On Monday 11 July 2005 19:21, AJ Lewis wrote: > On Mon, Jul 11, 2005 at 01:33:05PM -0400, Patricio Bruna V wrote: > > Its posibble to use GFS over DRBD? > > DRDB is active/passive, and GFS needs to be able to access the fs from both > nodes simultaneously, so no. There has been some discussion about making > DRDB active/active, in which case you could probably run GFS over it (on 2 > nodes) but AFAIK, it's not done yet, and if it is done, nobody's tested it. > > Regards, -- -------------------------- Nuno Miguel Pais Fernandes <npf@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Attachment:
pgp2742Z4rbAI.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
