On Fri, 2005-07-08 at 16:40 -0400, Lon Hohberger wrote: > > Perhaps a better way would be to make a copy of the struct for the > > shared resource_t any time it's referenced, rather than just using the > > same one for all resource_node_t. I'm willing to write up this patch if > > you think it's a better course of action. > > Both work. > > For now, I think we should use this, as copying an entire resource_t > structure has the downside of complicating reconfiguration, which is > already rather ... complicated :) > > Ideally, we'd just have private "last-check-time" and "last-check-level" > in the resource node structure and not put it in the resource action > structures. This would require a little more work. Birger -- can you apply that patch and let me know if it works for you? If so, can I convince one of you to file a bugzilla against rgmanager for tracking? :) -- Lon -- Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
