Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote: > Hi guys, > patch is pretty self-explanatory, when we did change the way in which we use > syscall, we forgot to add the relevant includes. > Patch is against the STABLE branch, but i am pretty sure it applies all over. > As a consequence it also shuts up a warning a build time. > > Please apply. > > Cheers > Fabio whops.. wrong patch.. sorry.. here is the good one.. Fabio -- no signature file found.
#! /bin/sh /usr/share/dpatch/dpatch-run ## add_missing_syscall_include.dpatch by <fabbione@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> ## ## All lines beginning with `## DP:' are a description of the patch. ## DP: No description. @DPATCH@ diff -urNad --exclude=CVS --exclude=.svn ./rgmanager/src/clulib/gettid.c /usr/src/dpatchtemp/dpep-work.JDJ8Uk/redhat-cluster-suite-1.20050706/rgmanager/src/clulib/gettid.c --- ./rgmanager/src/clulib/gettid.c 2005-06-21 20:07:33.000000000 +0200 +++ /usr/src/dpatchtemp/dpep-work.JDJ8Uk/redhat-cluster-suite-1.20050706/rgmanager/src/clulib/gettid.c 2005-07-06 06:40:22.000000000 +0200 @@ -1,7 +1,9 @@ #include <sys/types.h> +#include <sys/syscall.h> #include <linux/unistd.h> #include <gettid.h> #include <errno.h> +#include <unistd.h> /* Patch from Adam Conrad / Ubuntu: Don't use _syscall macro */
-- Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster